Follow-up evidence · Australian diagnostic imaging

Radiology follow-up, on the record.

One radiologist sentence is cited, reviewed, assigned for follow-up, then hash-sealed for public verification.

Open synthetic preview

Synthetic demo only. No live integration, urgency ranking, or downstream care completion claim.

Synthetic Follow-Up Evidence Pack

SNI-FU-2026-0010 · MRI · May 2026

Synthetic demo

Imported
Extracted
Source verified
Reviewed
Unknown
Sealed

Source sentence

Synthetic final report for Moirai demo use only. Procedure: MRI brain. Findings are illustrative and contain no patient-identifying data. Follow-up MRI in 9 to 12 months is recommended if clinically indicated by the referrer. This report text must not be treated as clinical advice.

Review

Confirmed required

Assignee

Sarah Bennett

Handoff

Recorded

Status

Unknown

Assigned for referrer liaison tracking. Synthetic follow-up task assigned for referrer liaison. Unresolved. In-network check recorded; the downstream outcome sits with the referrer and patient, outside practice visibility.

Public verifier seal

sha256:ce71142bb1…a2de6fd41c

Verifies ledger inclusion and manifest integrity only; not clinical truth, downstream care completion, diagnosis, treatment, urgency, or regulatory approval.

Verify synthetic seal

Operator preview

Operate the follow-up queue.

Review the sentence, assign the work, document status, and keep exceptions visible.

Open the operator previewSynthetic demo · no live RIS claim

Sydney North Imaging · synthetic command room

Follow-up status queue

Demo only

Pending review: 04
Assigned: 11
Exceptions: 03

01 · Source sentence

Radiologist-written recommendation visible before work starts

captured

02 · Review + assignment

Confirmed and assigned without transferring clinical responsibility

reviewed

03 · Communication

Booking, referrer handoff, or status evidence recorded

logged

04 · Exception register

Unknown downstream outcome remains visible

visible

The queue is administrative follow-up workflow. It does not diagnose, rank urgency, recommend treatment, or prove downstream care completion.

Follow-Up Evidence Pack · synthetic export

SNI-FU-2026-0002 · Ultrasound · May 2026

Verifier ready

Source sentence

Follow-up pelvic ultrasound in 6 weeks is recommended.

Verifies ledger inclusion and manifest integrity only; not clinical truth, downstream care completion, diagnosis, treatment, urgency, or regulatory approval.

Public-safe seal

sha256:ce71142bb16b...f9a2de6fd41c

Download synthetic Follow-Up Evidence Pack Verify the synthetic seal

Human review

Confirmed source text

Assignee

Practice manager

Follow-up status

Booked

Evidence Atelier

The export is a Follow-Up Evidence Pack, not a claim of care completion.

The buyer payoff is a printable, verifier-safe proof object: source sentence, human decision, assignee, communication evidence, follow-up status taxonomy, and a public hash check that returns no clinical content.

Public verification proves ledger inclusion and manifest integrity. It does not expose report text, patient identifiers, accession IDs, referrer names, or clinical free text.

Research trail

Founder radiology AI research cited in Forbes, Pharmaceutical Executive, and MDPI Diagnostics.

This is a research trail, not a customer-logo strip. Referenced in European policy material, Canadian policy documents, and patent literature.

See the research trail →

Aligned, not certified

The Follow-Up Evidence Pack is mapped to the standards a reviewer will name.

Moirai is not certified by these bodies and does not claim regulator approval. The follow-up record maps source sentence, human review, practice follow-up assignee, communication or handoff, follow-up taxonomy, and verifier seal to current published guidance.

RANZCR Chapter 9

Report communication, review discipline, and documented follow-up handling context.

Reviewed July 2026

TGA SaMD

Intended-purpose boundary: administrative workflow, not diagnostic AI.

Reviewed July 2026

Ahpra AI obligations

Professional accountability stays with practice policy and a qualified reviewer.

Reviewed July 2026

ACSQHC NSQHS

Communication, handoff, incident, and exception visibility for care transitions.

Reviewed July 2026

DISR AI plan

Transparency, accountability, and limitation language for AI-supported systems.

Reviewed July 2026

Moirai maps to the above guidance. No endorsement by any regulator, college, or agency is claimed.

Research basis

Built on radiology AI research cited 1,000+ times.

Moirai is informed by the founder's 2023 peer-reviewed paper in Diagnostics: Redefining Radiology: A Review of Artificial Intelligence Integration in Medical Imaging. Source-linked. Citation-checked. The full ledger is one click away.

Open the Research Ledger

Citation

Diagnostics · 2023

Redefining Radiology: A Review of Artificial Intelligence Integration in Medical Imaging

MDPI · doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13172760 ↗

Google Scholar citations

1,000+

scholar.google.com ↗

MDPI article views

100,000+

mdpi.com ↗

Most-cited article in Diagnostics

MDPI ranking ↗

Altmetric-scored research output

Top 5%

altmetric.com ↗

Referenced by

Forbes
Pharmaceutical Executive
European policy material
Canadian policy documents
Patent literature

Citation context only. Reference does not imply endorsement.

Why now

The recommendation already exists. The proof usually does not.

Follow-up status work is easier to document while the source sentence, reviewer decision, assignee, and communication trail are still fresh. Reconstruction later is weaker evidence.

Follow-up status unit

1report sentence becomes a record.

Moirai starts with the radiologist's own words and follows the administrative handling through to a public-safe seal.

01·Trigger·Report finalised: One report sentence can create a weekly operational obligation: find the recommendation, confirm the source text, and make the practice's handling visible.; [Radiologist-written recommendation]
02·Gap·Same week: Responsibility can split across referrer handoff, booking work, patient attendance, and external-provider visibility. The practice still needs an honest record of its own handling.; [Follow-up status taxonomy]
03·Proof·Later review: The defensible artifact is source sentence -> reviewer -> assignee -> communication -> follow-up status -> verifier seal, with limitations visible.; [Follow-Up Evidence Pack]

What Moirai produces

Follow-Up Evidence Pack

SNI-FU-2026-0002 · Ultrasound · May 2026

Synthetic seal

Source

Sentence visible

Review

Human confirmed

Assignee

Practice manager

Public-safe verifier hash

sha256:ce71142bb1...a2de6fd41c

Close the recommendation into a record.

Synthetic workflow, no PHI, no live RIS connection.

Open follow-up preview Verify the synthetic seal

Download synthetic Follow-Up Evidence Pack

The export is a Follow-Up Evidence Pack, not a claim of care completion.

Public verification proves ledger inclusion and manifest integrity. It does not expose report text, patient identifiers, accession IDs, referrer names, or clinical free text.

The recommendation already exists. The proof usually does not.

Follow-up status work is easier to document while the source sentence, reviewer decision, assignee, and communication trail are still fresh. Reconstruction later is weaker evidence.

Follow-up status unit

1report sentence becomes a record.

Moirai starts with the radiologist's own words and follows the administrative handling through to a public-safe seal.